Friday, 10 December 2010

DUE DATE : Perjalanan Mimpi Buruk Tak Terduga

Quotes:
Ethan Tremblay: Did you call me over here to apologize?
Peter Highman: What? Fuck You!

Storyline:
Peter Highman hanya memiliki waktu 5 hari untuk pergi ke Los Angeles dari Atlanta sebelum kelahiran putra pertamanya dimana istrinya Sarah menunggu. Sayangnya di airport, lewat serangkaian kejadian semenjak bertemu pemain teater bernama Ethan Tremblay, Peter mengalami kesialan terutama namanya masuk dalam daftar dilarang terbang. Ethan yang ditemani bulldog kesayangan bernama Sonny menawarkan tumpangan yang kemudian terpaksa diterima Peter untuk melintasi negara bagian termasuk cita-cita Ethan yaitu Hollywood dan tempat menabur abu almarhum ayahnya yakni Grand Canyon. Akankah keputusan Peter itu akan disesalinya di kemudian hari?

Nice-to-know:
Diselundupkan ke bioskop dengan nama "Maternity Day"

Cast:
Baru saja menyelesaikan peran Tony Stark dalam Iron Man 2, Robert Downey Jr. bermain sebagai Peter Highman yang sangat diuji batas kesabaran dan kemanusiaannya dalam perjalanan menunggui istrinya yang akan melahirkan.
Bermain dalam dua film drama komedi di tahun ini yaitu It's Kind of a Funny Story dan Dinner for Schmucks, Zack Galifianakis berperan sebagai Ethan Tremblay/Chase yang terobsesi untuk menjadi bintang di Hollywood.
Michelle Monaghan sebagai Sarah Highman
Jamie Foxx sebagai Darryl
Juliette Lewis sebagai Heidi

Director:
Nama Todd Phillips mencuat setelah kesuksesan tak terduga dari The Hangover (2009) yang akan dilanjutkan dengan sekuelnya tahun depan.

Comment:
Ada 2 hal yang perlu saya ingatkan sebelum anda memutuskan untuk menonton film ini. Pertama, ini adalah komedi, jadi singkirkan cara pikir rasional anda untuk sejenak. Kedua, pastikan anda sudah mengenal gaya Todd Phillips sebelumnya yaitu The Hangover. Jika anda bisa menerima kedua fakta tersebut, bisa jadi penilaian anda tidak akan jauh berbeda dari apa yang saya berikan. Namun jika tidak, rasanya anda akan mengganggap film ini sinting.
Oke dalam hal cast kita punya Downey Jr. dan Galifianakis yang teramat sangat mendominasi film ini. Dari awal sampai akhir mereka akan saling bertukar interaksi yang penuh humor slapstick termasuk dari dialog dan bahasa tubuh masing-masing. Harus diakui karakter Peter dan Ethan yang saling berseberangan itu bukanlah karakter yang mudah menarik simpati audiens. Penyebabnya adalah krisis identitas Ethan yang cukup mengganggu dan emosi terpendam Peter yang mengindahkan empati itu. Namun bagaimanapun juga chemistry keduanya tetaplah nilai jual utama. Downey Jr. tetap terlihat cool dan Galifianakis freak. Perpaduan 360 derajat yang merupakan makanan empuk bagi komedi situasi seperti ini.
Sutradara Phillips dapat dikatakan melakukan pengulangan beberapa elemen dari The Hangover seperti pasangan hidup yang menunggu nun jauh disana (dulu Barrese, kini Monaghan), karakter pendukung pria kulit hitam yang ternama (dulu Tyson, kini Foxx), pelacur yang numpang lewat (dulu Graham, kini Lewis) serta ganja ataupun drugs yang mengaburkan kesadaran Tidak salah sepanjang masih dapat dihadirkan dengan tema yang fresh dan eksekusi yang kreatif.
Kesimpulan akhir, Due Date cukup menghibur bagi saya yang mampu terpingkal-pingkal selepas kepenatan jam kerja yang ketat itu. Namun yang disayangkan adalah endingnya yang terkesan "too easy" dan tidak ada kejutan yang berarti. See it if you are a fan of Downey Jr. and acceptable for the concept of over-the-top comedy road-movie style.

Durasi:
95 menit

U.S. Box Office:
$90,882,138 till early Dec 2010

Overall:
7.5 out of 10

Movie-meter:
Art can’t be below 6
6-poor
6.5-poor but still watchable
7-average
7.5-average n enjoyable
8-good
8.5-very good
9-excellent

Family feud (Do Raaste)

Let's not get judgemental. For, it's very easy to find faults with the wicked parties in Raj Khosla's Do Raaste. The director, whose thrillers I feel are a hundred notches better than his family dramas, doesn't put any energies in creating grey characters. He makes the good ones in the film absolutely saccharine and the bad people never do anything good. There is hardly any subtlety in dealing

Thursday, 9 December 2010

CIN.. TETANGGA GUE KUNTILANAK! : Bertetangga Dengan Wanita Jadi-Jadian Menuntut Balas

Storyline:
Afgan dan Nono adalah penyiar radio yang membawakan program "Malam Jumat Seram" yang khusus membahas cerita-cerita hantu. Tanpa sengaja keduanya ditelepon oleh seorang gadis patah hati bernama Anissa yang bertekad bunuh diri setelah kematian calon suaminya. Insiden pun terjadi dan beruntung keduanya tidak dipersalahkan oleh pihak kepolisian. Namun mereka tidak berhenti dan bersama Nadine bekerjasama mengumpulkan kisah horor untuk dijadikan bahan film independen termasuk salah satunya narasumbernya adalah pembantu tetangganya yang bernama Bi Iyem. Bi Iyem menceritakan mantan majikannya Safina yang tertekan karena suaminya, Anton berselingkuh dengan sekretarisnya, Yuli hingga akhirnya tewas setelah melahirkan seorang bayi. Kekejian Yuli tidak sampai disitu karena membayar dukun untuk memasang paku di jasad Safina sehingga menjadi kuntilanak berwujud wanita cantik. Kini tugas Bi Iyem, Nadine, Afgan dan Nono membebaskan roh Safina sekaligus membalaskan dendamnya.

Nice-to-know:
Diproduksi oleh Vincent Pictures.

Cast:
Cynthiara Alona
Dafino Kandou
Ar Rozzy Mahally
Mayang
Melinda
Chairil JM
Trisno ”Tutul”
De’ratu
Deden Dower
Topan Dicky

Director:
Tidak banyak yang tahu bahwa Yan Senjaya pernah menjadi produser dalam Ken Arok - Ken Dedes di tahun 1983.

Comment:
Di penghujung tahun 2010 alias bulan Desember ini rasanya kelesuan menyergap perfilman nasional kita. Calon-calon penghuni daftar film terburuk sepanjang tahun bisa jadi berasal dari rilis akhir tahun. Mungkin inilah salah satunya dimana dari judul, poster dan ikhtisar ceritanya tidak ada yang positif. Entah apa yang ada dalam benak produser Lukito dan Wong Fen Sen saat memutuskan maju dengan proyek ini. Mungkin mereka lupa bahwa sekarang bukan tahun 1990an lagi tetapi tahun 2000an itupun sudah satu dasawarsa berlalu!
Prolog film dibuka dengan tulisan "Dari kumpulan cerpen horor". Jika ini terdiri dari kumpulan beberapa film pendek, bisa jadi segala kekurangan saya maafkan. Tetapi dari ide-ide tersebut ditambal sulam menjadi sebuah plot maka yang ada dalam pikiran saya adalah hasil jahitan yang acak adut tak jelas pola dan teksturnya. Itulah yang terjadi disini dan tak usah menelusuri terlalu jauh, lihat dulu dari karakter-karakternya. Kita punya tiga remaja yang penasaran akan hantu, seorang pembantu yang serba tahu, seorang dukun yang bergaya Joker dengan jahitan di sudut mulutnya, seorang suami tak setia, seorang wanita sekretaris berhati iblis, sesosok arwah penasaran yang mencari anaknya dan sebuah bayi yang ajaib tingkahnya. Ya, saya tidak salah ketik, karena bayi aneh itu bisa berganti-ganti "wujud" sehingga tidak saya kategorikan orang!
Sesungguhnya masing-masing dari mereka memiliki porsi masing-masing tetapi dipaksakan tumplek blek dalam satu scene sehingga memusingkan penonton yang harus memutar otak untuk mengingat-ingat kembali si ini hubungannya apa, si itu kenapa bisa kenal juga, dsb. Percayalah, usaha "mengingat-ingat" bukan sesuatu yang terpuji dalam mencerna film ini karena tidak ada gunanya juga. Lebih baik duduk dan nikmati saja dengan dua sikap. Satu, tertawalah jika dirasa perlu akan kelakuan jayus duet Afgan dan Nono yang serasa "Dumb & Dumber" itu. Dua, meringislah apabila dirasa anda mulai "tersiksa" dengan non existing plot yang disuguhkan penulis dan sutradara senior bernama Yan itu yang bisa-bisanya memakai beberapa visual efek ala FTV disini.
Jika anda tidak mau dipaksa mengucapkan judul film ini (karena memang bukan jati diri anda), maka sebaiknya anda tidak perlu merasa terpaksa juga menyaksikan Cin.. Tetangga Gue Kuntilanak! yang tampaknya terlalu serius ditambal sulam hingga berkali-kali melukai jari (dan sebagian jiwa) para filmmakernya. Ouch!

Durasi:
80 menit

Overall:
6 out of 10

Movie-meter:
6-sampah!
6.5-jelek ah
7-rada parah
7.5-standar aja
8-lumayan nih
8.5-bagus kok
9-luar biasa

War Stories - Part 3 - "Love Letters" - 1945

“Love Letters” (1945) is our third and last in the series of “war stories”. It’s a love story, and a mystery that doesn’t really need The War as a backdrop, but this was a time when so many letters were written, and relationships begun on the strength of a chance meeting.

In many families, the wife said goodbye to the husband (or sweetheart) at the train station. She said welcome home to him (if she was lucky), three or four years later.  The only way to communicate in the years between were by letters. They might meet again -- to resume their lives and their relationship -- as near strangers, unless the letters were particularly heartfelt, and the communication between them was open and honest.

I doubt in our age of instant, but often weak and meaningless, communication does the power of language ever come close to matching the importance it had during World War II.

Note: Ayn Rand co-wrote the script with the writer of the novel on this story is based, Christopher Massie.

Joseph Cotten, again here in his trademark role of the troubled, romantic loner, is an officer with the British Army in Italy. He pens the letters that his fellow officer, Roger Moreland, sends to his girlfriend. Roger, played by Robert Sully, is a boorish, self-centered cad, who, though unfaithful to this woman, is amused by the idea of winning her through Mr. Cotten’s tender prose.

Cotten is sick of the idea, and disgusted with himself for doing the chore, partly because he knows Roger is an ass, and partly because he fears he is falling in love with the woman who writes sensitive replies to his letters. He has a fiancée of his own, and he is growing apart from her. He seldom writes her, saving his deepest thoughts for Roger’s friend, Victoria.

“I was able to write to her all the things I was never able to say to any woman I know.” He says, and felt the ruse was innocent as long as the girl didn’t care. “But Victoria cared, understood.” He realizes Victoria has fallen in love, not with Roger as she believes, but with his letters.

“She’s in love with a man who doesn’t exist.”

Mr. Cotten demands the charade stop. He won’t write anymore, wants to know nothing more about her. When Cotten is seriously wounded and placed in a military hospital in Italy, he gets a letter from Roger, who has returned to England for training. Roger has married Victoria.

When Cotten is sent back to England to convalesce he learns from another pal that Roger is dead, not in the war but from an accident at home. This news nags at Mr. Cotten, because it means this Victoria is now a widow, and free, and a temptation in spite of himself. He also feels guilt for making possible what he suspects must have been a bad marriage.  In a way, though it is never couched in these terms, it's as if he prostituted this earnest, romantic woman to a callous stranger.

He still wants no part of the charade he committed, and wants to distance himself from what he has done.  But when his brother takes him to a party at a friend’s flat, Cotten meets Victoria even though he is not aware of it, mainly because she is not aware she is Victoria.

Victoria is played by Jennifer Jones in their second pairing after last year’s “Since You Went Away.” She goes by another name, because she has lost her memory. There is more intrigue to come, and we get bits and pieces a little at a time. I won’t give a play-by-play on the plot, that would ruin it, but we do learn that Roger was murdered, and Mr. Cotten discovers his letters played a part in a tragedy and the great mystery of Miss Jones’ amnesia.

Jennifer Jones is by turns ethereal, and also teasing and free spirited. This is also something of a trademark role for her, the fey innocent, but she appears more at ease in this film and less fragile than in some of her other work.

Ann Richards plays her friend, a woman who took Jones into her flat and cared for her when she was unable to take care of herself. Ann Richards also had minor roles in “Random Harvest” (see this post) and in “Sorry Wrong Number” (see this post here and here), but her film career ended in the early 1950s.

It’s difficult to believe she could not have been given better promotion by a studio in Hollywood and enjoyed a longer film career, as she has an engaging presence in this film. Her role is minor, but she shows a range of emotion and great chemistry with Joseph Cotten. Until Cotten falls in love with Jennifer Jones, one might suspect, and even wish, that she would get together with Cotten.

Notice the scene where, when Ann Richards wants to discuss the tragedy/mystery privately with Cotten, she sends Jennifer Jones to the store to get some porridge. She hands her their ration book. Since the UK imported most of their cereals (and a lot of other products), rationing was more severe there and lasted well beyond the war. Though the US had its own rationing program, I don’t think we rationed oatmeal (porridge). Maybe somebody can set me straight on that. Being the so-called “bread basket of the world” had its compensations.

We don’t see too many ration books of the day in the movies, and I’m not sure why. Possibly the government requested the cooperation of the film industry not to make too big a joke of them so that people would follow the rules and take their use seriously. Possibly they did not want to harp on (though an English setting in this movie, this was still an American-made movie for an American audience), shortages to an audience weary of them and doing its utmost to sacrifice.

Mr. Cotten takes up residence in a country cottage left to him by his deceased aunt, where he is looked after by rustic family retainer Cecil Kellaway (whom we saw in “Portrait of Jennie”, see here). Ian Wolfe plays a vicar, and Harry Allen a local farmer, both character actors who you might remember from “Mrs. Miniver”, which we reviewed in the second post on this series.

Gladys Cooper, who also teamed up with Jennifer Jones in “Song of Bernadette” (1943), see this previous post, plays Miss Jones’ guardian. She plays prominently in the tragedy/mystery, and she’s a shadowy figure for most of the film. It’s not until the very end we get her story and the truth about Victoria. It’s a good scene between Jones and Cooper, where they both reach back into their memories and describe a particular pivotal event, each finishing the other’s sentences.


The war in this movie, unlike in “Mrs. Miniver” and “The More the Merrier” is less on the surface of everyday life for these country dwellers and more in the fog-shrouded background, though there is one scene where Cotten, driving with Jones on winding lanes, does mention the gas rationing, “Since you love motoring so much, we’ll travel to the end of our coupons.”

Also, there is a scene with a wedding in what appear to be the bombed-out ruins of a church, evocative of the end of “Mrs. Miniver.” The war is still present in this movie, but it seems to be sliding into the background.

And I think that portrait of the little boy which figures in a couple of scenes that Joseph Cotten says is him as a child really was him. There is a similar photo in his autobiography, “Vanity Will Get You Somewhere” (Mercury House, Inc., San Francisco, 1987). In that book, he states that the photo was also used in “Shadow of a Doubt”.


The war is mostly represented in the letters he has written to her, and in his depression on coming home. He tells her, “Ever since I came back from the war, I’ve wanted to be alone. I’ve been miserable with other people. You’re the first one with whom I feel at peace.”

She replies, “That’s because you’re broken up inside almost the same as I am. You’ve been through the war and you can’t bear to look back.”

In this movie, and as World War II drifted into the past (the film was released in August 1945, after the Japanese surrender but before the formal surrender ceremonies in September), the generation that fought the war seemed to decide in large measure not to talk about it anymore. Many servicemen, like Joseph Cotten in the film, preferred not to look back.

Much of that war is documented in letters, and the intriguing notion that two people can fall in love without ever meeting each other…I would not hazard a guess as to how many times that actually happened. I don’t doubt that it did.

This is the end of our series on “war stories”. The all-clear has been sounded. Now get out of my cellar.  I'd better not be missing any cans of SPAM.

Tuesday, 7 December 2010

Victims of circumstance (Anhonee)

I've always had immense faith in the pairing of Raj Kapoor and Nargis. Be it their high strung passion depicted in Awaara, their innocent love story in Shree 420, their likable romance in Aah or their adventurous affair in Chori Chori. In every single one of these cinematic delights, these two awesome actors have delivered. But, here is one film that took me absolutely by surprise. An obscure